Boom times are back in Silicon Valley. Office parks along Highway 101 are once again adorned with the insignia of hopeful start-ups. Rents are soaring, as is the demand for fancy vacation homes in resort towns like Lake Tahoe, a sign of fortunes being amassed. The Bay Area was the birthplace of the semiconductor industry and the computer and internet companies that have grown up in its wake. Its wizards provided many of the marvels that make the world feel futuristic, from touch-screen phones to the instantaneous searching of great libraries to the power to pilot a drone thousands of miles away. The revival in its business activity since 2010 suggests progress is motoring on.
So it may come as a surprise that some in Silicon Valley think the place is stagnant, and that the rate of innovation has been slackening for decades. Peter Thiel, a founder of PayPal, and the first outside investor in Facebook, says that innovation in America is “somewhere between dire straits and dead”. Engineers in all sorts of areas share similar feelings of disappointment. And a small but growing group of economists reckon the economic impact of the innovations of today may pale in comparison with those of the past.
[ … ]
Across the board, innovations fueled by cheap processing power are taking off. Computers are beginning to understand natural language. People are controlling video games through body movement alone—a technology that may soon find application in much of the business world. Three-dimensional printing is capable of churning out an increasingly complex array of objects, and may soon move on to human tissues and other organic material.
An innovation pessimist could dismiss this as “jam tomorrow”. But the idea that technology-led growth must either continue unabated or steadily decline, rather than ebbing and flowing, is at odds with history. Chad Syverson of the University of Chicago points out that productivity growth during the age of electrification was lumpy. Growth was slow during a period of important electrical innovations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries; then it surged.
| Winning entries could not be determined in this language pair.There was 1 entry submitted in this pair during the submission phase. Not enough entries were submitted for this pair to advance to the finals round, and it was therefore not possible to determine a winner.
Competition in this pair is now closed. |
硅谷之春又来了!矗立在101号公路旁的商务别墅,初创公司的标志再次点缀其间。随着顶级度假屋的持续走热,在像太浩湖这样的风景小镇,房价也水涨船高。金钱似乎在这暗流涌动。旧金山湾区, 半导体工业与计算机的摇篮,也孕育了众多经历过兴衰起伏的互联网公司。从智能触控手机到海量资源快速检索,再到可千里之外遥控的无人机,硅谷“魔术师们”的超前杰作令世界惊叹。硅谷商业活力的二次迸发始于2010年,到现在仍势头不减。 某些人认为硅谷的创新力早已日落西山,其已然是一滩死水。然而,当前情况似乎有些出他们的意料。贝宝创始人彼得·蒂尔,作为Facebook的首位外部投资者,他表示美式创新无非就是在孤注一掷中绝地求生,众多领域的工程师也纷纷表示深有同感。而有些经济学家则认为,如今创新对经济的影响相较过去有所弱化。 放眼全球,廉价处理器所驱动的创新正处雨后春笋之势。电脑开始理解人类语言;人们只需通过肢体运动即可控制游戏,而这种科技在商业领域将会大有作为。3D打印轻而易举就能制造出日趋复杂的物体模型,随之还可能被应用于人体器官和有机材料等领域。 而创新悲观主义者则认为这只不过是昙花一现。他们认为科技主导下的经济发展必然是不进则退的,而非此消彼长,这和传统看法背道而驰。芝加哥大学的Chad Syverson则指出,电气化时代的生产率增长并不均衡;19世纪和20世纪相交之时,在某段时间内,电气化革命正如火如荼,而生产力则截然相反。之后,生产力才爆发式增长。 | Entry #27005 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specifiednone
Qing Xiong (X)Ameerika Ühendriigid |